Understanding the Time series plots
Time series plots show the changes in each indicator as a function of time, over the period 1980-present. Each plot also shows horizontal lines that indicate the median (middle) value of that indicator, as well as the 10th and 90th percentiles, each calculated for the entire period of measurement. Time series plots were only developed for datasets with at least 10 years of data. Two symbols located to the right of each plot describe how recent values of an indicator compare against the overall series. A black circle indicates whether the indicator values over the last five years are on average above the series 90th percentile (plus sign), below the 10th percentile (minus sign), or between those two values (solid circle). Beneath that an arrow reflects the trend of the indicator over the last five years; an increase or decrease greater than one standard deviation is reflected in upward or downward arrows respectively, while a change of less than one standard deviation is recorded by a left-right arrow.
Alaska
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Alaska was higher than 67% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Alaska’s coastal employment has been relatively steady between 2014 - 2019, with a clear decreasing trend but no substantial difference from historical patterns.
Gauge
The gauge value of 67 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Alaska was higher than 67% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Hawaiʻi
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Hawaii and the Pacific Islands was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Hawaii’s average coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, although no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 80 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Hawaii and the Pacific Islands was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
California Current
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the California Current was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment in the California Current ecosystem between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, with an increasing trend over that period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 80 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the California Current was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Gulf of Mexico
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Gulf of Mexico was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment along the Gulf of Mexico between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, and no substantial trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 87 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Gulf of Mexico was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
US Caribbean
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the US Caribbean was only higher than 20% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment within the U.S. Caribbean between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, with no trend over that period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 20 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the US Caribbean was higher than 20% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Southeast
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Southeast US was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment within the Southeast between 2014 and 2019 was substantially above historical levels, although no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 87 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Southeast US was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Northeast
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Northeast US was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment within the Northeast between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, and an increasing trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 87 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Northeast US was higher than 87% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Great Lakes
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Great Lakes was higher than 60% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around the Great Lakes between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, and no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 60 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for the Great Lakes was higher than 60% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Lake Ontario
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Ontario was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around Lake Ontario between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, and an upward trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 80 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Ontario was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Lake Erie
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Erie was higher than 60% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around Lake Erie between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, although no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 60 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Erie was higher than 60% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Lake Huron
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Huron was higher than 47% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around Lake Huron between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, although no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 47 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Huron was higher than 47% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Lake Michigan
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Michigan was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around Lake Michigan between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, although no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 80 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Michigan was higher than 80% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Lake Superior
Coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Superior was only higher than 13% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Values correspond to total employment in all industries in the coastal counties of a given region
Time Series
Average coastal employment around Lake Superior between 2014 and 2019 was similar to historical levels, and no trend is apparent over that same period.
Gauge
The gauge value of 13 indicates that coastal employment between 2014 and 2019 for Lake Superior was only higher than 13% of all years between 2005 and 2019.
Extreme Gauge values:
A value of zero on the gauge means that the average coastal employment level over the last 5 years of data was below any annual employment level up until that point, while a value of 100 would indicate the average over that same period was above any annual employment level up until that point.
Data Source:
Coastal employment numbers were downloaded from the NOAA ENOW Explorer Tool, filtered to present only coastal county values using the Census Bureau’s list of coastal counties within each state. ENOW Explorer streamlines the task of obtaining and comparing economic data, both county and state, for the six sectors dependent on the ocean and Great Lakes: living resources, marine construction, marine transportation, offshore mineral resources, ship and boat building, and tourism and recreation. Data are derived from Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW), available on NOAA’s Digital Coast. Of note is that these data fail to include self-employed individuals. Coastal county employment numbers were then summed within each region for reporting purposes.
Resources
Socio-Cultural Dimensions
We conduct research to better understand the impacts of management decisions on our nation’s vital fishing communities. Each region creates fishing community profiles, which contain social and economic data. Social indicators are used to help assess community resilience and vulnerability.
Social Indicators Map
NOAA Fisheries developed social indicators to characterize community well-being for coastal communities engaged in fishing activities.
NOAA Economic National Ocean Watch data base
This report examines the critically important economic contributions of the oceans and Great Lakes. The report presents the NOAA Office for Coastal Management’s Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW) data set, and includes a variety of infographics at the national, regional, and state levels.
Economics: National Ocean Watch (ENOW) for Self-Employed Workers
This data set describes the self-employed workers whose jobs directly depend on the resources of the oceans and Great Lakes. Data are derived from Census Nonemployer Statistics and include the number of self-employed workers and gross receipts for the six sectors defined by ENOW. These time-series data are available at the national, regional, state, and county levels.